Almanac: At the Capitol

This unsigned anonymous note is what greeted me this morning in my Capitol office. Frankly, it's rather creepy to me to have people putting accusatory notes in my office when I'm not there. I have had people stalk me, who leave anonymous notes, follow me and have threatened to kill me. This is true for almost anyone who works in television, so we're a bit sensitive to such actions. So if anyone knows who is responsible, please let me know because it's at the very least highly unprofessional and downright creepy.

Now, to the specific questions: The creepy questioner asks "Do you have any evidence related to this charge?" First of all, in my blog post I wasn't making a charge. I was asking a question. "Veto Gender Gap?" was the headline. Note the question mark. I was reflecting an issue raised by four other people, not me. As was noted in the post, Sen. Anderson, Sen. Pappas, Rep. Sertich and at least one reporter raised the issue.

For further evidence, my colleagues have spelled it out pretty clearly in their stories. St. Paul took the brunt of the vetoes. The largest projects that were vetoed came from St. Paul: Central Corridor, Bell Museum, Como Zoo, and more. The female chair Rep. Alice Hausman is from St. Paul. One reporter saw her appear to be crying after the vetoes. Her St. Paul senators said she ran out of the governor’s office because she was so upset.

*Update, the governor's press secretary wrote the note and just supplied this response:

Mary –

I tried calling you yesterday evening and this morning, but have missed you. Please feel free to post this entire email on your blog if you’d like (in fact, I’d prefer if you did so my side of the story can be fully shared with your readers)

I left you that note around 6:00 p.m. yesterday. I came downstairs to talk with you, but when you weren’t there, I just wrote a note and left it. Unfortunately, I forgot to write my name on it, but after I slid it under the door I figured I’d just call you first thing Tuesday to discuss it. I didn’t intend it as an “anonymous” note, as I always planned to follow up with a call.

What bothered me is that, once again, you posted an untrue and unfair accusation from Democrats without contacting our office for a response. You did this on March 14 when you posted their claim that the Governor had not met with DFL leaders, which was not true. And now you post their claim that gender was a factor in the Governor line-item vetoes without contacting our office for a response. This claim is also untrue.

Several other reporters heard DFL legislators claim gender bias regarding the Governor’s vetoes. But none of those reporters actually reported on it, because the claim is ludicrous on its face. This is a Governor who has worked very closely with women over the course of both his private sector and public sector careers. His Lt. Governor is a woman. More than 75 percent of the policy staff in the Governor’s Office are women. His general counsel is a woman. It’s pretty serious to claim that the Governor took official actions with gender in mind as a factor. I believe, at a minimum, you should have given us an opportunity to respond before posting such a claim.

You also said in your post that “the question some reporters started asking is if gender looks like a factor.” No reporter asked that question in the press conference with Governor Pawlenty, so I guess you mean that reporters asked that question after some DFL legislators raised the issue in the hallway after the press conference.

Again, I apologize for not signing my name to the note I left you. And I agree that my handwriting is pretty creepy. I really need to work on my penmanship. Not signing the note was an unfortunate oversight on my part, but I just jotted it down standing in the hallway of the press corps yesterday evening. My concerns about your blog posting still stand, however. I look forward to continuing to work with you around the Capitol.

Sincerely,

Brian McClung
Director of Communications
Office of Governor Tim Pawlenty